US lawmakers, led by Rep. Krishnamoorthi, file amicus brief in case of threat from Chinese ownership of TikTok

0
- ADVERTISEMENT -
FILE PHOTO: The TikTok logo is pictured outside the company’s U.S. head office in Culver City, California, U.S., Sept. 15, 2020. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo

August 4, 2024: The members of the US-based Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party (SCCCP) on Saturday, August 3, filed a bipartisan amicus curiae brief ub the TikTok v Garland case, urging the authorities to address the threat of Chinese ownership of the social media platform.

The brief mentioned that it seeks to protect all Americans from foreign adversary-controlled applications that present a clear national security threat to the US.

“Over 50 lawmakers file a bipartisan amicus brief in defense of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act in TikTok v Garland. The brief defends the act to address the threat of Chinese ownership of TikTok,” the SCCCP said in a post on X.

Congressmen Raja Krishnamoorth, D-Illinois, and John Moolenaar, R-Michigan, headed the brief filing, which underlined the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACAA).

Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi announcing the reintroduction of the bipartisan resolution on Diwali, Nov. 3, 2023. PHOTO Courtesy Office of Rep. Krishnamoorthi

TikTok’s mother company, ByteDance, which belongs to China, currently faces PAFACAA in the US, which means it has to either divest itself from the platform (sell US operations of TikTok) or face a total ban as it has been alleged to have stolen the data of its 170 million US users.

According to the amicus curiae brief, “Congress determined that foreign adversary-controlled applications that present a clear and significant national security threat should not be permitted to access application stores or web hosting services in the United States.”

The brief further said that to stop foreign adversaries from targeting, surveilling, and conducting covert repression campaigns against the American people through social media and related applications, the Divestiture Act requires “companies controlled by the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea, the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the Islamic Republic of Iran to divest themselves of that control or face restrictions in the United States.”

The brief also alleged that China intends to use TikTok against the United States.

“The Divestiture Act is backed by extensive legislative factfinding demonstrating that foreign adversary nations seek to exploit applications including social media to target, surveil, and conduct other covert activities (including transnational repression) against the American people,” it stated.

Additionally, the SCCCP, in its brief, also pointed out that it and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence have held numerous classified briefings and open hearings on the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party generally and through TikTok specifically.
In these briefings, several national security and technology experts testified about the People’s Republic of China’s technology ambitions.

The brief added that it also has testimony from the Director of the FBI on the national security threat posed by TikTok during its annual Worldwide Threats hearing.

A similar brief was also filed by the Foundation of Defense of Democracies (FDD) on Friday. The 28-page brief by the FDD details how TikTok’s current ownership structure has enabled the CCP to infiltrate the company and dictate the kinds of information it obtains from Americans and stores in China, thereby threatening US national security.

This data includes information about children, which is protected by federal law; viewers who watch LGBTQ+ material; and even driver’s licenses and other personal information of TikTok users, a press statement by the FDD said.

“Beyond TikTok’s surveilling Americans (including journalists), FDD shows the Court how Beijing uses the platform to manipulate the kinds of news and information users receive at the Chinese government’s behest, interfere in U.S. elections, and prepare for “cognitive combat” (psychological warfare) — reinforcing the argument that a forced sale is constitutional,” the statement added.

Notably, India was among the first countries to ban TikTok, citing ‘security concerns’. The Union government banned TikTok and several other Chinese apps in June 2020 over ‘national security concerns’. Before the ban, the app had about 150 million monthly active users in India.

Following this, Nepal also announced a ban on the China-owned video-sharing app TikTok, citing its negative efforts on ‘social harmony’.

Moreover, TikTok is already partially or completely banned in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Afghanistan, Denmark, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Norway, concerning the security issues with the video-sharing app.

Share

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here