ABC’s of H-1Bs – Part 2

- ADVERTISEMENT -

Understanding the Importance of Prevailing Wages for H-1B Employers

Employers hiring H-1B nonimmigrants must navigate a complex regulatory landscape. One key requirement is the obligation to pay the appropriate wage to the sponsored employee. This process begins with filing a Labor Condition Application (LCA) with the Department of Labor (DOL), a prerequisite for every H-1B petition. The LCA must specify the number of workers being sponsored, the occupational classification, and the wage rate for the position. Employers must attest to offering the greater of the actual wage or the prevailing wage for the job in question.

What Is the Prevailing Wage?
The prevailing wage reflects the average wage paid to workers in a particular occupation in a specific geographic area. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that the employment of H-1B workers does not adversely affect the wages of U.S. workers. Employers must base the prevailing wage on the best available data, typically derived from sources like Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA) or the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey.

- ADVERTISEMENT -

Why Is the Prevailing Wage Important?
Compliance with prevailing wage regulations protects both U.S. and H-1B workers. Offering wages below the mandated levels could result in penalties, including back wages owed to the employee. Moreover, ensuring fair compensation reinforces the integrity of the H-1B program by discouraging wage undercutting.

Employers must maintain thorough documentation to demonstrate how the prevailing wage was determined. This documentation may be requested during DOL investigations or audits. Failure to comply can result in significant financial and reputational consequences.

How Are Prevailing Wages Determined?
The prevailing wage depends on several factors, including the nature of the job, its location, and the required qualifications. If a CBA applies to the position, its wage rates must be used. For roles not covered by a CBA, employers may use a private wage survey or rely on the OES survey.

The OES survey categorizes wages into four levels based on the complexity of the job and the qualifications required:

• Level I: For entry-level roles requiring limited experience and basic understanding.
• Level II: For roles requiring a good understanding of the field, typically involving moderate complexity.
• Level III: For experienced professionals with specialized skills or advanced knowledge.
• Level IV: For highly skilled individuals in senior or managerial roles.

For instance, an entry-level software developer might be classified under Level I, while a senior data scientist would fall under Level IV due to their expertise and responsibilities.

The Role of Documentation
Employers are not required to maintain detailed position descriptions for each role. However, they must retain records of how the prevailing wage was determined. This could include wage surveys, documentation of the job duties, or evidence supporting the wage level selection. These records must be available for public inspection and for DOL review during audits.

The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) Administrator oversees compliance with wage attestations. If documentation is insufficient, the WHD may consult the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) to determine the appropriate prevailing wage. Alternatively, the WHD may use the information provided in the H-1B petition, such as the employer’s Letter of Support or Form I-129, to assess whether the wage level aligns with the job description.

Practical Examples of Wage Determination
To illustrate, consider a scenario where an employer seeks to hire a mechanical engineer with a master’s degree and three years of experience. Based on ETA guidelines, this position would likely qualify for a Level II or Level III wage, depending on the job duties. Assigning a Level I wage would be inappropriate, as the role requires more than basic qualifications.

Another example involves an IT manager responsible for overseeing a team of developers. This position would warrant a Level IV wage due to the managerial responsibilities and the need for advanced expertise. Employers must be cautious when selecting wage levels, as misclassification could lead to compliance issues and potential back wage liabilities.

Impact of Location on Wages
The geographic area of employment also influences the prevailing wage. For instance, a software engineer in Silicon Valley would command a higher prevailing wage than one in a smaller city due to cost-of-living differences and regional market rates. Employers must ensure that the wage determination reflects the specific location where the employee will work, considering factors such as remote or hybrid work arrangements.

Challenges in Compliance
Navigating prevailing wage requirements can be challenging, particularly for employers unfamiliar with the H-1B process. Common pitfalls include underestimating the job’s complexity, failing to account for location-specific factors, or neglecting to document the wage determination process. Employers who fall short of compliance may face DOL investigations, back wage payments, and potential debarment from the H-1B program.

Best Practices for Employers
To avoid compliance issues, employers should:

1. Use reliable wage determination sources, such as the OES survey or CBAs, to establish the prevailing wage.
2. Document the methodology used to determine wages and retain these records for at least three years.
3. Ensure that job descriptions accurately reflect the required qualifications and responsibilities.
4. Periodically review prevailing wage rates to stay updated on changes in market conditions.

Employers may also benefit from consulting with immigration attorneys or HR professionals specializing in H-1B compliance to ensure their practices align with federal regulations.

The Role of WHD and ETA in Enforcement
When investigating potential violations, the WHD may request assistance from the ETA to obtain the prevailing wage for the position in question. However, this option is rarely exercised. More commonly, the WHD relies on the employer’s submitted documentation or petition materials to assess compliance.

If an employer fails to provide adequate records, the WHD may calculate back wages based on its prevailing wage determination. This underscores the importance of maintaining accurate and thorough documentation throughout the H-1B process.

Conclusion
Employers sponsoring H-1B workers must carefully evaluate wage requirements to ensure compliance with federal regulations. Offering the greater of the actual wage or the prevailing wage protects both the employee and the integrity of the H-1B program. By considering factors such as job complexity, location, and industry standards, employers can avoid costly mistakes and maintain compliance.

For more information about the H-1B visa process, contact the immigration attorneys at the Nachman Phulwani Zimovcak (NPZ) Law Group, P.C. Visit www.visaserve.com, email info@visaserve.com, or call 201.670.0006 (x104).

Related posts:

ABC’s of H-1Bs – Part 1 Employer‐​sponsored Green Card processing delays cross the 3‑Year threshold H-1B visa in 2017: Only 58,200 regular visas available for Indian nationals What Role Does the Bureau of Labor Statistics Play in the PERM Process?